Clarify ambiguity in section 19 of the Designs Act.

At a glance

Policy ID: 35

Status: Completed

Priority: High

Design rights ACIP

Issue summary

Currently, section 19 of the Designs Act 2003 lists the factors to be considered in assessing whether a design is substantially similar in overall impression to another design. However, two different approaches to determining who satisfies this standard have emerged in Australian case law which has led to uncertainty and increased costs for stakeholders and in design litigation.

Amendment of section 19 may clarify the ambiguity and ensure more predictability for examination of designs.

History

  • Policy Development 04-Sept-2017
  • Consultation 31-Oct-2019 to 20-Dec-2019
  • Policy Development 20-Dec-2019 to 12-May-2020
  • Legislative drafting 12-May-2020 to 23-Jul-2020
  • Consultation 23-Jul-2020 to 28-Aug-2020
  • Legislative drafting 28-Aug-2020 to 02-Dec-2020
  • In Parliament 02-Dec-2020 to 30 August 2021
  • Royal Assent 10 September 2021
  • Completed 10 September 2021

Comments

The part of this policy issue related to the standard of the informed user is included in the Designs Amendment (Advisory Council on Intellectual Property Response) Act 2021 and commenced on 11 September 2021.

If you wish to provide us with further feedback on the other aspects of this issue, we invite you to use the form below.

Policy feedback

You can provide feedback on this policy through the form below.

Confirmation

By clicking the submit button below, you consent to any personal information you provide through this form being handled in accordance with the IP Australia Privacy Policy.