Amend rules for determining priority of patent claims to prevent self-collision ("poisonous priority")

Policy ID: 
Policy development
Issue summary: 

In rare circumstances, it is possible for the disclosure of a priority document to be novelty destroying for a subsequent application by the same applicant, despite claiming priority from the first document. This can happen when multiple alternatives are presented in a single claim, only some of which are entitled to the earliest priority.

Section 43 of the Patents Act is intended to prevent this occurrence by allowing claims to multiple forms of the invention to have multiple priority dates, but has been interpreted narrowly by the courts, arguably defeating the policy intent of the section.

Clarification of section 43 may address this situation and prevent an applicant's own priority document being prejudicial to the novelty of their subsequent filing.

Policy Development 04-Sept-2017
Work is being undertaken to identify the scope of the problem and whether legislative change is necessary.

Policy feedback

Mandatory fields are marked with an asterisk *

More information
  • Files must be less than 10 MB.
  • Allowed file types: jpg jpeg png rtf pdf doc docx.
By clicking the submit button below, you consent to any personal information you provide through this form being handled in accordance with the Privacy Notice and the IP Australia Privacy Policy

Privacy Notice

The personal information you provide to the Policy Register (including through any submissions) is collected by IP Australia for the purposes of gaining stakeholder insights and feedback into various policy issues and feedback on the Policy Register trial. Your personal information is handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy and is protected by the Privacy Act 1988. Our Privacy Policy states how you may access and correct the personal information we hold; how we protect your personal information; how you may make a privacy complaint and how we will deal with your complaint; and the contact details for IP Australia’s Privacy Contact Officer. Please read our Privacy Policy for more information.

Any personal information you provide will be used for the purposes of administering the Policy Register and the Policy Register trial, responding to feedback, and contacting you in relation to any feedback. IP Australia may provide any personal information collected to IP Australia staff, the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science and the relevant Ministers’ offices. IP Australia will not disclose your personal information to any overseas recipients.

Whilst your personal information may be provided anonymously, IP Australia may not be able to contact you or respond to your feedback.

IP Australia will not otherwise use or disclose your personal information without your consent, unless authorised or required by or under law. By providing any personal information to the Policy Register (including through any submissions), you consent to your personal information being handled in accordance with this privacy notice and the IP Australia Privacy Policy.