Public consultation on several Intellectual Property (IP) matters

Last updated: 
30 August 2017

IP Australia has opened public consultation on five IP policy matters, four of which form part of IP Australia’s proposed implementation of the Government’s response to the Productivity Commission’s 2016 report on Australia’s IP arrangements (PC report), and one which relates to a trade marks issue. For ease of access, the papers are available individually at the links below, and as a single document here. The consultation period closes on 17 November 2017.

The legislative amendments relating to these issues are proposed for inclusion in a Bill intended for introduction to Parliament in 2018 (following drafting and proposed further consultation on an Exposure Draft of the amendments).

IP Australia is also currently consulting the public on the implementation of other measures covered by the Government’s response to the PC report (Part 1), with a view to introducing this set of amendments into Parliament in early 2018. These measures include phasing out of the innovation patent system, the plant breeder’s rights recommendation and the majority of the trade mark recommendations. The consultation period closes on 4 December 2017.

Paper 1: Amending inventive step requirements for Australian patents

This paper discusses the proposed implementation of the Government’s response to recommendations 7.2 and 7.3 of the PC report. The PC recommended that IP Australia further align the inventive step standard for the grant of a patent in Australia with that of the European Patent Office through raising the inventiveness threshold and introducing a requirement for applicants to disclose the technical feature of their invention.

The Government supported these recommendations, and the paper puts forward options for changes to the Patents Act 1990, and the guidance that would be included in the  explanatory materials accompanying the changes.

Paper 2: Introduce an objects clause into the Patents Act 1990

This paper discusses the proposed implementation of the Government’s response to recommendation 7.1 of the PC report. The Government’s response supports the PC recommendation that an objects clause be introduced into the Patents Act 1990.

An objects clause provides additional clarity and guidance to the community on the purpose of legislation, assists the courts in interpreting the legislation, and can be used to resolve uncertainty and ambiguity. This paper discusses options for the precise wording of an objects clause to set out the purpose of the patents legislation.

Papers 3 & 4: Amending the provisions for Crown use of patents and designs; and amending the provisions for compulsory licensing of patents

In its response to the PC report, the Government highlighted that in addition to an objects clause, it would also consult on recommendations made by the PC in its 2013 Report, Compulsory Licensing of Patents. These recommendations are intended to ensure that the Crown use and compulsory licensing provisions are working as intended.

Paper 3 discusses options for reform of Crown use provisions for patents and designs. The PC considered that the current provisions were unclear on the purposes for which Crown use may be invoked, and did not sufficiently provide for transparency and accountability in the use of those provisions. Options for reform include clarifying the purposes for which Crown use can be invoked, and introducing a ministerial oversight process and remuneration standard.

Paper 4 discusses options for the reform of compulsory licensing provisions for patents. The PC considered that there was uncertainty as to how the current provisions applied. Options for reform include changing the statutory test and remuneration standard for the grant of a compulsory licence. Paper 4 also discusses proposed changes to address an issue raised by stakeholders concerning compulsory licences and dependent patent inventions.

Paper 5: Introducing divisional applications for international trade marks

This paper discusses the introduction of divisional trade mark applications (divisionals) for International Registrations Designating Australia (IRDAs) filed under the Madrid Protocol. Divisional applications for trade marks are currently available under Australian legislation, but only for applications made directly to IP Australia and not for IRDAs.

The paper also discusses consequential proposals to harmonise and amend the existing practice in Australia for dividing domestic trade mark applications to align with the new IRDA divisional procedures.

While these proposals are not related to the PC report, IP Australia considers them high-priority for implementation in 2018.

How to make a submission

IP Australia invites interested parties to make written submissions in response to the questions presented in these papers by Friday 17 November 2017.

IP Australia will consider the submissions, and undertake further consultation on an Exposure Draft of the legislation.

Written submissions should be sent to

For accessibility reasons, please submit responses by email in Word, RTF, or PDF format.

The contact officer is Lisa Bailey, who may be contacted on (02) 6222 3695, or via email on

Submissions should be received no later than 17 November 2017.

Privacy Notice

Personal information is collected during this public consultation for the purposes of gaining stakeholder insights and comments on the proposed amendments to the Intellectual Property Rights legislation and regulations, and is protected by the Privacy Act 1988.

Your submission, along with any personal information you provide as part of that submission, will be published on IP Australia’s website. Information published online may be accessed world-wide, including by overseas entities. Once the information is published online, IP Australia has no control over its subsequent use and disclosure.

If you would prefer that your submission, or any part of your submission, not be published on our website, please notify IP Australia in writing, clearly identifying that the whole submission is confidential or the particular parts of the submission you consider to be confidential. IP Australia will not publish any submission or part of a submission that you have marked as confidential.

Your submission, including any personal information you provide, may be disclosed to the relevant Ministers and their offices, the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science and other Commonwealth government agencies, for the purpose of briefing on the results of the consultation in general and/or about specific issues on which you have commented. This disclosure may occur whether or not your submission has been marked as confidential. Where contact details are provided, IP Australia may also contact you by telephone or email to discuss your submission.

A request made under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 for access to a submission marked confidential will be determined in accordance with that Act.

IP Australia will not otherwise use or disclose your personal information without your consent, unless authorised or required by or under law.

IP Australia retains sole discretion to decide not to publish a submission or part thereof, or to remove any defamatory or offensive content from a submission before publishing it on IP Australia’s website.

All personal information you provide is handled in accordance with IP Australia’s Privacy Policy. The Privacy Policy contains relevant information, including:

  • how you may seek access to and correction of the personal information we hold;
  • how you may make a complaint about a breach of the Privacy Act and how we will deal with your complaint; and
  • IP Australia’s privacy contact officer details.

By making a public submission, you provide your consent to your personal information being handled in accordance with this privacy notice and the IP Australia Privacy Policy.