READ NEXT
Can I patent software?
While there are no specific exclusions for patenting software or computer products or computerised methods or systems, they can only be patented if the ‘substance of the invention’ contains sufficient artificiality and usefulness. This can be tricky to determine.
Before you apply, ask yourself:
- is the invention new?
- is it inventive, and different enough to what's been done previously?
- is it eligible for patent protection, that is, is it the type of invention that can be patent protected?
Computer-based inventions are eligible for patent protection provided they comply with Australian patentability legal requirements. Such inventions can be disclosed in various forms, including:
- software
- software implemented on a computer
- a computer configured to perform a specific function
- a computerised process or method or system
- a physical product that includes a computer, such as a smart phone, gaming machine, or a household appliance.
How to understand the substance
The patentability of computer-related inventions depends on more than just their form or the way in which the invention is explained.
To be patentable, the true character or 'substance' of the invention must be more than the mere use of a generic computer to carry out an otherwise unpatentable business method, scheme, game, plan or idea. Understanding the substance comes down to how the invention words, including the contribution that the invention makes. Does the invention lie in a technical aspect, is it improving the operation of a particular device or system, or is it improving something more abstract?
When it comes to computer-implemented inventions, simply putting a business method, a scheme or an abstract idea such as a mathematic idea into a computer is not patentable, unless there is an invention in the way in which the computer carries out the scheme or method. It must be more than “what” the computer is doing, and instead be more like “how” the computer is actually operating to improve the computer's operation.
For example, if you found a way to make the computer process data in a faster way, or store data more efficiently than what was previously known, that is, a more efficient data compression technique, then it may be patentable (if it qualifies on novelty and inventive step considerations as well).
The fact that a claimed method can only be implemented in a computing environment, does not guarantee that it will be eligible for patent protection. For example, a scheme is not eligible for patent protection simply because the application and utility of the scheme is limited to, or can only exist in the context of the internet.
Note that the substance of the claimed invention is determined in conjunction with the description in your application. The detail provided in the specification with regard to various aspects of the invention is an indicator of where the substance lies, and whether this relates to something that is sufficiently artificial or technical. Lack of detail or specificity in how the computer or other technology is used may indicate that the invention is directed towards a scheme, rather than how the computer or other technology operates to provide a technical innovation. Therefore, it is in your interest to provide comprehensive details on how your invention works in a technical manner.
Smartphone applications
Most of the time, an app simply performs known functions. Even though you've invented a new way of doing business, your app won't be patentable unless the substance related to a technical improvement or improves the manner in which a general purpose computer operates.
Examples of what applications can be patented
Can be patented
A messaging app that implements a new encryption algorithm for improving security of transmitted and stored messages.
Why? The substance of the invention resides in a technical innovation that improves data security.
Can't be patented
A messaging app that provides a more modern look and feel through the implementation of a new layout or different colour schemes.
Why? The substance of the invention is limited to non-technical, aesthetic aspects such as the look and feel of the interface.
Can be patented
A mobile app for reporting on workplace hazards that provides an improved data structure for storing location data, in conjunction with related image data, that results in a more efficient way of storing and retrieving such related data.
Why? The substance of the invention is directed to a technical innovation that improves the way data is stored in the computer.
Can't be patented
A mobile app for reporting on workplace hazards that utilises well-known functions of the mobile device, such as communication, GPS or camera modules, to track the location of a user and provide notifications relating to workplace defects and hazards to a user.
Why? The substance of the invention lies in the use of known technology to improve a business function, being the reporting of workplace hazards. As such, this is considered to be a business innovation as opposed to a technical innovation.
Can be patented
A game app, where the contribution lies in the implementation of improved user interface controls that allow a user to more efficiently input word guesses into a word puzzle or select a betting option and place a wager with fewer clicks or interactions.
Why? The substance of the invention results in a technical innovation that improves the usability of the game.
Can't be patented
A game app, such as a word puzzle or betting app, where the contribution lies in the application of particular game logic or rules, such as determining the outcome of a wager in a betting game or determining valid words in a word puzzle.
Why? The substance of the invention merely relates to abstract concepts that determine the outcome of the game.
Copyright
In Australia, source code, executable code, data banks and tables are automatically protected under copyright legislation. You don't need to register it, as copyright exists automatically from the moment the work is created.
The code also doesn't need to be ‘original’ in the sense that nobody has written similar code before. To qualify, authors need to demonstrate that they've used their skill and labour to create the software in question, without copying someone else’s work.
Copyright also covers published materials accompanying software such as user documentation, website content, and software user interfaces in the form of original text, images and layout.
Note that copyright protects the specific code of a computer program, but it doesn't protect the ideas or methods the program employs.
Copyright in Australia
Do I have copyright protection in other countries?
Not all foreign countries recognise copyright for code, data banks or tables. Some have processes you'll need to follow to be protected.
If you wish to ensure overseas copyright, we recommend that you don't publish your work until you've consulted with a patent attorney.
Open source code
Before deciding to use open source software or release your own code under an open source licence, carefully consider the terms governing use and distribution and their legal consequences. Open source code often comes with the benefit of tapping into a community of developers. However, you should also be aware of the IP implications of using existing open source code for your own software or releasing your own code as open source.
There are many standard forms of licence terms which are used for open source software. It’s typical for these licenses to place restrictions on the redistribution of the open source software, or software bundled with or built upon the open source software.
For example, if you use open source code as part of your work, there may be an expectation that your code will become subject to the same open source licence as the code you’ve used. Which means there might be an expectation that it can also be freely copied, studied, adapted, modified and distributed. This may get beyond your control and leave you unable to commercialise its use.
Can I patent hardware?
Yes, physical devices that work in an improved way over previously known devices can be patented.
This includes:
- complete computer systems
- computer components such as disk drives, memory chips, bus architectures and monitors
- accessories for computers, such as a keyboard with an improved construction
- 'Internet of Things'-type devices that have specific functions and incorporate processors.
As with software, a consideration of the substance of the claimed invention is necessary. The key to the ability to patent your invention is that it has 'improved working'. For example, if you invented a storage disk that has a new format or data layout that results in fewer errors, increased data storage, or faster access, you can patent it. However, if your disk only differs from existing disks due to the information stored on it, it cannot be patented.
Mixed computer-implemented inventions
Inventions that involve a computer interacting with physical elements or objects external to the computer, can be patentable.
The patentability of such inventions is determined along the same principles as discussed above, with the emphasis on where the substance of the claimed invention lies. The presence of an innovation involving technology can occur inside or outside the computer. For example, if there is an improvement in a scientific model or engineering outside of the computer, such that improves the working of an apparatus outside of the computer (for example through making some other apparatus more energy efficient or otherwise physically improved), it is not necessary that there is an innovation in the way a computer performs an associated calculation.
Another factor that is taken into account is the degree to which the physical features in your claimed invention interact with features of the implemented method to allow the invention to work, with consideration of the detail of the interaction given in the description.
The existence of an external physical effect can be indicative of patentable subject matter, however, it is also necessary to consider the underlying cause of this physical effect and whether it arose as the result of a scheme or something technical.
Example 4 - computer-implemented algorithm applied to the outside world
Can be patented
A communications system, computer program and smartphone were configured to interact and determine signal strengths of entry and exit signals to control the entry to and exit from a restricted area, or the user's vehicle.
Why? Although the components and measurement techniques were all individually well-known, the components interacted to determine the location of the vehicle using signal strength and then control the opening and closing of the gate.
Can't be patented
A computer algorithm is used to determine the optimal route for a user to take to collect an item from one of several possible collection points. Conventional computer technology is used in the algorithm, and there were no outline or details of any code or algorithm in the description that explains how the optimisation is to be performed.
Why? Although there can be the physical effect in the delivery of goods to their destination in an optimal manner, the substance of the invention is to an improved logistics scheme that allows for the optimised delivery. Furthermore, the technical details of the implementation of the invention on the computer was significantly lacking, indicating that the substance lay in a scheme.
Integrated circuit layouts
Circuit layouts are the layout designs of computer chips or semi-conductor chips. In Australia, they're generally not patentable, however, they're automatically protected by legislation that's modelled on copyright law principles.
To better understand manner of manufacture and the substance of your innovation, we encourage you to seek advice from an IP attorney.
They will be able to provide specific advice on your products and services as well as your protection strategy.
Resources for attorneys
The Manual of Practice and Procedure sets out the practice that an examiner will follow.
You'll find manner of manufacture in Part 5.6. Various aspects of ICT inventions are covered by:
5.6.8.1 General Principles – Assessing Manner of Manufacture
5.6.8.4 Discoveries, Ideas, Scientific Theories, Mere Schemes and Plans
5.6.8.6 Computer Implemented Inventions, Mere Schemes, and Business Methods
5.6.8.7 Games and Gaming Machines
5.6.8.8 Mathematical Algorithms
Practitioners will also be aware that the Commissioner intervened in the matter of Encompass Corporation Pty Ltd v InfoTrack Pty Ltd (NSD 734/2018). The
Commissioner's submissions to the court provide an overview of the their understanding of the law, and aren't a substitute for the manual.
We want to give you the best understanding of our approach to patenting computer technology. View our presentation on Manner of Manufacture Information and Computer Technology Patent Office Practice to learn more.