Policy ID: 
35
Status: 
Completed
Priority: 
High
Issue summary: 

Currently, section 19 of the Designs Act 2003 lists the factors to be considered in assessing whether a design is substantially similar in overall impression to another design. However, two different approaches to determining who satisfies this standard have emerged in Australian case law which has led to uncertainty and increased costs for stakeholders and in design litigation.

Amendment of section 19 may clarify the ambiguity and ensure more predictability for examination of designs.

History: 

Policy Development 04-Sept-2017

Consultation 31-Oct-2019 to 20-Dec-2019

Policy Development 20-Dec-2019 to 12-May-2020

Legislative drafting 12-May-2020 to 23-Jul-2020

Consultation 23-Jul-2020 to 28-Aug-2020

Legislative drafting 28-Aug-2020 to 02-Dec-2020

In Parliament 02-Dec-2020 to 30 August 2021

Royal Assent 10 September 2021

Completed 10 September 2021

Comments: 

The part of this policy issue related to the standard of the informed user is included in the Designs Amendment (Advisory Council on Intellectual Property Response) Act 2021 and commenced on 11 September 2021.

If you wish to provide us with further feedback on the other aspects of this issue, we invite you to use the form below.

Tag: 
ACIP
Designs
124